Daniel Nordin

Dan Nordin is a member at Gustafson Gluek PLLC.

Dan joined Gustafson Gluek in October 2011 as an associate and became a member in 2019.  Since joining the firm, Dan has primarily practiced in the areas of antitrust and consumer protection, helping small businesses and individuals recover compensation for the misconduct of large corporations.  In addition to his normal practice areas, Dan has represented several individuals through the Minnesota Federal Bar Association’s Pro Se Project, a program that matches pro se litigants with pro bono attorneys.  

Dan is a member of the Federal Bar Association and the Minnesota Bar Association and has been designated as a Minnesota “Rising Star” by Super Lawyers from 2018 – 2022. For more information regarding Dan and a list of his representative cases, see below.

More About Daniel

    • University of Minnesota Law School - J.D., magna cum laude (2011)

    • University of Minnesota - B.A., high distinction (2007)

    • Minnesota State Bar

    • U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota

    • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

    • Named a Minnesota Rising Star by Super Lawyers (2018-2022)

    • Recognized as a North Star Lawyer by the Minnesota State Bar Association (2020)

  • Dan is currently representing a class of online publishers pursuing antitrust claims against Google, In re Google Digital Publisher Antitrust Litigation (S.D.N.Y.). Plaintiffs’ claims center on allegations that Google unlawfully achieved and maintained monopoly power in the online display advertising marketplace and thereby was able to suppress the revenues that publishers receive from selling ad space on their websites.

    In In re Crop Inputs Antitrust Litigation (E.D. Mo.), Dan is representing a class of farmers pursuing antitrust claims against manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers of crop inputs, which includes seeds and crop protection chemicals such as fungicides, herbicides, and insecticides. Plaintiffs allege an unlawful agreement between the defendants to artificially increase and fix the prices of crop inputs.

    In Jones v. Varsity Brands, LLC (W.D. Tenn.), Dan is representing a class of competitive cheer athletes pursuing antitrust claims against Varsity Brands, the U.S. All Star Federation, and other individuals and entities. Plaintiffs allege that these actors conspired to raise, fix, and stabilize prices charged associated with competitive cheer, including for uniforms, competitions, and training camps.

    Other Representative Cases:

    • In re Hard Disk Drive Suspension Assemblies Antitrust Litig. (N.D. Cal.)

    • In re Surescripts Antitrust Litigation (N.D. Ill.)

    • In re FICO Antitrust Litig. (N.D. Ill.)

    • In re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litig. (N.D. Ala.)

    • In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust Litig. (S.D. Cal.)

    • In re Dealer Management Systems Antitrust Litig. (N.D. Ill.)

    • In re Resistors Antitrust Litig. (N.D. Cal.)

    • The Shane Group, Inc. vs. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (E.D. Mich.)

    • In re Parking Heaters Antitrust Litig. (E.D.N.Y.)

    • In re Drywall Antitrust Litig. (E.D. Pa.)